- Welcome to abreaction.
heresy against conformity
Recent posts
#1
idea / Re: DiversityWatch
Last post by prime - Jul 10, 2026, 04:28 PMDiversity News (July 10, 2026)
Netflix fades, NYC goes globalist, 4chan vs UK, Hindu nationalism, gang rape in Europe.
https://www.amerika.org/politics/diversity-news-july-10-2026/
Netflix fades, NYC goes globalist, 4chan vs UK, Hindu nationalism, gang rape in Europe.
https://www.amerika.org/politics/diversity-news-july-10-2026/
#2
tech / Re: F/OSS follies
Last post by prime - Jul 10, 2026, 04:12 PMQuoteGoogle still controls 90% of the search market, its stock price has more than doubled in the past year and revenue growth in the first quarter was the fastest for any period since 2022.
https://tech.slashdot.org/story/26/07/09/1829252/google-search-hits-all-time-usage-record
#3
idea / Re: DiversityWatch
Last post by prime - Jul 09, 2026, 10:53 AMDiversity News (July 9, 2026)
14A, racial violence in sports, Hispanic identity, Botswana rising, alien-hiding judge walks.
https://www.amerika.org/politics/diversity-news-july-9-2026/
14A, racial violence in sports, Hispanic identity, Botswana rising, alien-hiding judge walks.
https://www.amerika.org/politics/diversity-news-july-9-2026/
#4
idea / Re: Divorce, cheating, and inf...
Last post by prime - Jul 09, 2026, 10:31 AMQuoteThe association between women's higher earnings and relationship dissolution was noticeably stronger among couples raising children. Female-breadwinner couples with children were 49% more likely to separate than male-breadwinner couples, whereas childless female-breadwinner couples were 23% more likely to separate than their male-breadwinning counterparts.
This finding suggests that balancing work and family responsibilities may place greater strain on relationships when women have higher earnings, perhaps because household responsibilities remain unevenly shared.
https://www.psypost.org/why-do-relationships-fail-when-women-earn-more-study-challenges-traditional-explanations/
#5
sense / Re: Platonism
Last post by prime - Jul 08, 2026, 04:57 PMEven more, it seems to me that purposive decisions are rare. Most people do what they like doing or are accustomed to doing, and only react if stimulus comes their way. They are lottery players by nature and blame luck for everything that goes wrong in their lives, but attribute to themselves everything that goes right.
#6
sense / Re: Platonism
Last post by sub rosa - Jul 08, 2026, 12:37 PMThis one sounds interesting too.
https://www.proquest.com/openview/a6df1001baa30074fd3f53646ae720bd/1?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=49061
https://www.proquest.com/openview/a6df1001baa30074fd3f53646ae720bd/1?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=49061
#7
sense / Re: Platonism
Last post by sub rosa - Jul 08, 2026, 12:31 PMhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/09567976241243004
Anendophasia varies in degree and probably maps the Bell Curve.
Then there's also the question of the 'quality and significance' of inner speech - to borrow from academia - for those in the middle who exhibit "some" of that intermittently, roughly 1/4 of waking moments but that sounds like an over-estimation to me.
If it's about what they buy, how they measure up compared to the Jonses, and what a jerk so and so is because they "did me dirty" and how karma should get them (ego)... well, that's not a whole lot.
Only a minority (around 10%) supposedly exhibits no inner speech at all, responding strictly to external stimuli. These are probably the classic tards without the science naming the spade. If you ask Chatty, it walks on eggshells ... 'well it's not really true that most people have no inner speech" then it proceeds to make the technical apologetics above.
Sure it's true. A conscious and vigorous inner wrestling with abstract transcendental, ethical, and spiritual notions (big problems) is simply rare. So that's that.
Anendophasia varies in degree and probably maps the Bell Curve.
Then there's also the question of the 'quality and significance' of inner speech - to borrow from academia - for those in the middle who exhibit "some" of that intermittently, roughly 1/4 of waking moments but that sounds like an over-estimation to me.
If it's about what they buy, how they measure up compared to the Jonses, and what a jerk so and so is because they "did me dirty" and how karma should get them (ego)... well, that's not a whole lot.
Only a minority (around 10%) supposedly exhibits no inner speech at all, responding strictly to external stimuli. These are probably the classic tards without the science naming the spade. If you ask Chatty, it walks on eggshells ... 'well it's not really true that most people have no inner speech" then it proceeds to make the technical apologetics above.
Sure it's true. A conscious and vigorous inner wrestling with abstract transcendental, ethical, and spiritual notions (big problems) is simply rare. So that's that.
#9
idea / Re: DiversityWatch
Last post by prime - Jul 08, 2026, 10:25 AMDiversity News (July 8, 2026)
ICE shootings, Barbara Ann, Indian organized crime, fake refugees, AFD banned.
https://www.amerika.org/politics/diversity-news-july-8-2026/
ICE shootings, Barbara Ann, Indian organized crime, fake refugees, AFD banned.
https://www.amerika.org/politics/diversity-news-july-8-2026/
#10
sense / Re: Platonism
Last post by sub rosa - Jul 08, 2026, 07:31 AMAre you referring to the studies on inner dialogue?